July 07, 2006
Jeopardy With Annika, Round 4
TBinSTL chose the latest category: Anal Bum Covers. Here's how it works, I'll describe the album cover, you name the artist.
Since TBinSTL didn't indicate what dollar amount he chose, I'll make it $100. Please don't forget to name your dollar amount when you have control of the board.
Here's the clue:
Posted by: annika at
12:14 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Who is The Velvet Underground?
Posted by: Mike C at July 07, 2006 03:40 AM (y6n8O)
2
Mike is quick !!
remember the instructions "peel slowly and see"? I loved the 60's
Posted by: jimi at July 07, 2006 04:41 AM (BN/Fu)
3
*Bzzzzzzzzzzz* Who is the Velvet Underground?
I'll take "shoes shoes shoes" for $500.
Posted by: Victor at July 07, 2006 04:58 AM (L3qPK)
4
Ding
Who is the Velvet Underground with Nico?
Posted by: skippystalin at July 07, 2006 07:00 AM (ohSFF)
5
ANnie,
Skippy is the correct answer, we musn't forget the sumptuous Ms. Nico who's vocal styling on "I'll be Your Mirror" suggested a life of enviable and incomparable misery. A ravaged beauty if ever there was one. Not that Lou has managed getting into his sixties without looking quite the worse for wear. (Name drop now....) He and I were having Pizza last spring on the LES (sitting at different tables unknown to each other) and he looks pretty beat up as does his always inventive wife Laurie Anderson.
Posted by: Strawman at July 07, 2006 08:16 AM (G2Zzw)
6
EMH:
(*Too scared to touch his buzzer/shocker thing, didn't know the answer anyway*)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 07, 2006 08:21 AM (xHyDY)
7
No! No! No! The correct question is:
What is
The Velvet Underground and Nico.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at July 07, 2006 01:27 PM (fs1yQ)
8
Oh, wait.
Here's how it works, I'll describe the album cover, you name the artist.
Ooops. I guess Mike did get it. Curses!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at July 07, 2006 01:30 PM (fs1yQ)
9
Skippystalin is correct. I was wondering if you'd join us Skippy. I wonder if you sniffed out the Jessica Alba video and thought you'd stay for the game.
Skippy has control of the board. You may now either name a new category or stick with the existing ones. Don't forget your dollar amount.
Posted by: annika at July 07, 2006 03:31 PM (fxTDF)
10
I thought responding before leaving early for work, eastern time zone advantage, and absurd recollection of something I clearly shouldn't have remembered combined to assure me control of the board. As it were: NICO, nada, nil.
Nice work Skipster, let the game continue!
Posted by: Mike C. at July 07, 2006 05:18 PM (wZLWV)
11
Bogus! My answer would have passed muster with the judges!
If you're nitpicking, the correctest answer would be (after hitting the signalling device), "Who
are The Velvet Underground
and Nico."
And Strawman is, as usual, incorrect. Nico's vocal stylings on anything she sings suggest either she was strung out on heroin (again) or that she couldn't sing. Or both.
Posted by: Victor at July 07, 2006 08:11 PM (l+W8Z)
12
How culd I not take Canadians You've Never Heard of Of for $500.00, Annika?
Posted by: skippystalin at July 07, 2006 09:43 PM (ohSFF)
13
Victor,
You can deal. Or not. Whatever.
Posted by: skippystalin at July 07, 2006 09:48 PM (ohSFF)
14
Victor,
I don't know why you wouldn't agree that "incomprable misery" might be synonymous with being strung out on herion. I don't get the "wrong" of this equation unless you, during the halcyon days of your youth and drug abuse, thought yourself a happy fellow.
Posted by: Strawman at July 08, 2006 07:39 AM (G2Zzw)
15
Geez, Strawman, I'm beginning to think you wouldn't recognize joking if you tripped over it.
Posted by: Victor at July 08, 2006 07:19 PM (l+W8Z)
16
Victor,
Geez, VIc, I didn't know any of this was ever not humorous. But if you thought I was too sensitive I apologize.
Posted by: Strawman at July 09, 2006 12:36 PM (G2Zzw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 06, 2006
Happy Birthday To The Bikini
Yesterday was the
60th anniversary of the bikini.
No, not this bikini.
I'm talking about this kind!
So scandalous was the first modern-day bikini that the only female free-spirited enough to pose in one was a stripper. Parisian engineer-turned-designer Louis Reard released the suit at a fashion shoot on July 5, 1946. It was cut high on the hip, but the really stunning feature was that it bared the navel, a part of the body that in modern history had been off-limits for public display.
The tiny two-piece shocker signaled the coming transformation of attitudes toward the body. Still, it would take more than a decade for most American women to get comfortable with wearing the skimpy suit.
The baring of the belly button was the big hurdle.
"I can't think of any situation in the thousand years before the '60s when it was acceptable to show the navel, '' said Kevin Jones, a curator and fashion historian at the Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising in Los Angeles.
Maybe so, but as the article points out, the bikini wasn't invented in 1946. It was only re-introduced. According to Wikipedia (font of all knowledge) "Two-piece garments worn by women for athletic purposes have been observed on Greek urns and paintings, dated as early as 1400 BC."
Here's a scene from the famous Roman "bikini girls" mosaic at the Villa Romana del Casale in Italy, which dates to the early 4th Century A.D.

(The chick on the left demonstrates something the Romans liked to call "nipplae slipae.")
Over the course of this blog, I've done a couple of bikini related posts. Let's take a look back, shall we?
Two years ago, I linked to a swimwear poll, which revealed that 7 out of 10 women own a bikini, and California girls prefer low-rise bottoms, while East coast girls like a mid-rise.
Last winter, I went all out and did a bikini fashion preview. In that post I predicted that polka dots would be "in," and I was right. I saw polka dots all over the place. Speaking of nipus slipus, that was the post where I coined the term ""dunstation."
I'll probably toast the bikini's 60th birthday with a fruity drink and a swim after work. That sounds like a plan. How will you celebrate?
Posted by: annika at
06:58 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 392 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I shall celebrate by asking my lovely wife for a beach date ASAP.
Posted by: Hugo at July 06, 2006 09:20 AM (yLeev)
2
I'm gonna hang out at my local mosque with the lastest SI Swimsuit Edition and a Pacifico.
Posted by: blu at July 06, 2006 11:42 AM (j8pkL)
3
We were hoping you would model one...
Posted by: BobG at July 06, 2006 04:02 PM (+zarT)
4
You simply can't find this wonderful diversity of topics anywhere else in cyberland. Drew Carey said it best: Annika Rocks!
Posted by: Mike C. at July 06, 2006 06:30 PM (wZLWV)
5
A blog on bikinis and you dont have the guts to get in one and show a pic? There goes your credibility. You would have fit in well pre1946.
Posted by: Jeff at July 06, 2006 07:09 PM (mQhCk)
6
are you a premium subscriber Jeff? huh?
well then, you can't complain if you're not.
Premium subscribers to annika's journal get the following:
1. access to all of annika's journal photo archives
2. new photo shoots every day in a different costume
3. naked video chatting
all for only $1999.95 per month!
Posted by: annika at July 06, 2006 07:18 PM (fxTDF)
7
I thought that would hit you where you lived. Im loving it!
Posted by: Jeff at July 06, 2006 07:40 PM (mQhCk)
8
Move that decimal point two spots to the left an' we'll think about it

BTW, that 2nd link had an awful lot of Jessica Alba in it. Not that that's a bad thing. In fact, it's a good thing. Think I'm gonna bookmark it...
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 06, 2006 07:55 PM (nAE4x)
9
Annika,
I still do my bikini shopping here
www.wickedweasel.com
These are some serious threads and down under women have some serious body issues!
Posted by: strawman at July 07, 2006 05:02 PM (G2Zzw)
10
just window shopping i hope, strawman.
anyways those things are way too small for normal people to wear.
Posted by: annika at July 07, 2006 05:38 PM (fxTDF)
11
aNNIKA,
ahh, that's why we have pretenatural.
Posted by: Strawman at July 08, 2006 07:43 AM (G2Zzw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 05, 2006
Jeopardy With Annie, Round 3
The category, chosen by Matt of
Overtaken By Events, is "Canadians You've Never Heard Of," for $100.
Posted by: annika at
10:16 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh! Ringy-dingy-poo!
Who is John Rutsey, who stepped aside so the only "lead drummer" in rock and roll, Neil Peart could take his throne?
Posted by: TBinSTL at July 05, 2006 10:39 PM (bYmT0)
2
I would have preferred "Canadians You Wish You Never Heard Of" -- of course, the answer "Bryan Adams" is almost too obvious to make the question worth while.
Posted by: Craig at July 05, 2006 10:48 PM (GzeUl)
3
Sorry, Craig. I should have been thinking more clearly.
Posted by: Matt at July 05, 2006 11:38 PM (FPM2T)
4
Bleeep!
Who the F*** is Neil Peart?
Posted by: shelly at July 06, 2006 03:30 AM (BJYNn)
5
"Who the F*** is Neil Peart?"
For shame! Only one of the world's greatest living drummers and probably the world's ONLY hardcore libertarian lyricist.
There'll be a quiz on Friday.
Posted by: Matt at July 06, 2006 05:48 AM (FPM2T)
6
The correct response is John Rutsey, who left the band to become a weightlifter.
TBinSTL (who's from either Seattle or Saint Louis, or maybe Tampa Bay) has control of the board and the opportunity to name another category, if you so wish.
Posted by: annika at July 06, 2006 06:11 AM (fxTDF)
7
Woot!
It's StLouis....for the next category, Annie, if that is your real name, I would like Anal bum cover....er....An album cover.
Tim
Posted by: TBinSTL at July 06, 2006 09:17 AM (bYmT0)
8
"anal bum covers?" weird. okay, for what amount?
Posted by: annika at July 06, 2006 11:58 AM (zAOEU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Eeew!
Here's an example of not thinking a project through before starting.
Posted by: annika at
07:26 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My throne! I've finally found it!
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 05, 2006 08:49 AM (xHyDY)
2
I guess he never heard of Scotch-guard!
Posted by: strawman at July 05, 2006 03:01 PM (G2Zzw)
3
Reminds me of Saturday Night Live and The Love Toilet - Victoria Jackson & Kevin Nealon share the most intimate moment of them all... "Because when you're in love, even five minutes apart can seem like an eternity."
Posted by: Scof at July 05, 2006 03:42 PM (a3fqn)
4
Wow! My normal viewing of 2 per day just went up 30-fold! Thanks Ms. Annika!
Posted by: Kevin at July 05, 2006 03:59 PM (++0ve)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday Is Poetry Day
On this day after Independence Day - I hope you had a good one! - here is a snapshot of America in 1860, by her greatest poet, Walt Whitman:
more...
Posted by: annika at
07:04 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1525 words, total size 10 kb.
1
hey Annika - I thought a poem as wonderful as this one deserved at least one comment. Thanks for digging it up and putting it in front of us!
Mr Whitman really can transport one's mind...he guided me all over our great county, and thankfully kept me out of Newark!
jimi love
Posted by: jim at July 05, 2006 05:59 PM (apKKo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Annika's Jeopardy, Round 2
The category is "American Skankwomen."

Posted by: annika at
06:40 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Matt at July 05, 2006 07:18 AM (YHNR5)
2
*ding!*
What is "A guy?"
Posted by: Kevin at July 05, 2006 08:04 AM (++0ve)
3
Bzzzaaaap! (OOOOOWWWW!!!!!)
Who was Jude "Looks Like A Lady" Law?
Who rewired my *$^@ button? Cas!!! You sonovanannika'sbitch! Was that you??!!
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 05, 2006 08:46 AM (xHyDY)
4
Matt of Overtaken By Events is correct. You have control. Name a new category or stick with American Skankwomen...
Posted by: annika at July 05, 2006 11:36 AM (zAOEU)
5
New Category: Canadians You've Never Heard Of
I'm off to spend my newfound wealth.
Posted by: Matt at July 05, 2006 12:53 PM (YHNR5)
6
You didn't indicate the dollar amount, so I'm making it $100, just to keep things moving.
Posted by: annika at July 05, 2006 10:08 PM (fxTDF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 04, 2006
Annika's Journal Jeopardy, 2006
It's July, and that means it's time for the second annual annika's journal version of the popular game show, Jeopardy!
I'll be your host. As last year, I pick the answers, you guess the questions, and you must remember to use the signalling device and phrase your response in the form of a question.
I'll start it off with the first category: "American Skankwomen." Like last year, the first couple of correct responders will get to name the rest of the categories, until all the category boxes are filled. (Of course, I'll reserve the right to veto any categories i think are lame.)
So here's the first question:

Good luck!
Update: Controversy on the first question already! Drake Steel's response, which was accepted by the judges, was 54 hours. According to Wikipedia, Brittany's marriage to Jason Alexander lasted 55 hours. Just to be absolutely certain, I looked up the annulment certificate, which bears a time stamp of 12:24 p.m. on January 5, 2004. I then determined the difference between the reported time of marriage, 5:30 a.m. and the time of annulment. The result is exactly 54 hours and 54 minutes. So, therefore I would have accepted either 54 or 55 hours as a correct response. So big congratulations to Drake, who participated last year but never got on the board!
Posted by: annika at
11:45 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Beeeeeep!!
What lasted less than 24 hours?
Posted by: shelly at July 04, 2006 12:16 PM (BJYNn)
2
BzzzzzAAAP!!
What is "A Blink of an Eye"?
(Oooooowwwww! I thought these were buzzers, not electric shockers!)
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 04, 2006 12:43 PM (xHyDY)
3
Ding!
What is 54 hours, Annika?
Drake
Posted by: Drake Steel at July 04, 2006 01:39 PM (Bep4Q)
4
Ding,
What is 58 hours?
Posted by: skippystalin at July 04, 2006 04:14 PM (ohSFF)
5
What is "if hours were IQ points, it would be a tie".
Posted by: Ted at July 04, 2006 05:27 PM (+OVgL)
6
Ding!
What is "we don't know yet because it's still ongoing."
As you'll remember, the event in Vegas was annulled. So the KFed hoohaa is her first marital menage.
Posted by: Casca at July 04, 2006 05:55 PM (2gORp)
7
Casca, ever wonder why people hate lawyers?
Posted by: shelly at July 04, 2006 06:28 PM (BJYNn)
8
Ding.
What is until the buzz wore off?
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at July 04, 2006 07:32 PM (DdRjH)
9
Buzzzzzz
"What is when he sobered up?"
Posted by: Keith at July 04, 2006 07:42 PM (7AYFc)
10
Oh no Shell, I know. In every legal wrangle there is a winner and a loser, and both parties have lawyers. In the end, even the winner at least suspects that the lawyers fucked him.
Posted by: Casca at July 04, 2006 07:45 PM (2gORp)
11
The thing that gets me is how some people can blow right past my flawless reasoning as if it were not fact. I suppose that most of us are at least a little drunk today.
Posted by: Casca at July 04, 2006 07:46 PM (2gORp)
12
Bzzzzzzapt
Ouch. What is... Hey. Casca, who you calling "a little drunk"? sheesh
Posted by: Stew at July 04, 2006 08:12 PM (2LMpg)
13
After much discussion, the judges are going to give it to Drake Steel! Nice job, Drake! You may now name the next category, or you can continue with "American Skankwomen."
Posted by: annika at July 04, 2006 11:10 PM (fxTDF)
14
Wow! Even my 16 year old son, who like knows all this stuff (admittedly he can't stand BS) was stumped. So, Ms Trebek, lets go with American Skankerwoman for $200.00!
Also concerning lawyers, Abraham Lincoln (my personal all time hero) won a lawsuit for the railroad vs steamship companies in what was like a landmark case, had to sue the railroads to pay him. Lawyers have the most thankless job!
Posted by: Drake Steel at July 04, 2006 11:53 PM (Bep4Q)
15
Fuck That! I'm not playing. This shit is fixed, just like last year. Whoever heard of Drake fucking Steel.
Posted by: Casca at July 05, 2006 06:27 AM (rEC2k)
16
I want a bell that goes "Ding", like Drake's.
Heh... anyone realize that my first draft read
"I want a Ding, like Drake's"? Gawd, the responses
that woulda produced...
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 05, 2006 08:43 AM (xHyDY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 02, 2006
Single White TOS-TNG-DS9 Fan Looking For Par'Machi
Have you heard about the
Star Trek fans' internet dating site, Trek Passions?
It was after a wildly unsuccessful run with Esquire.com Personals, a paid service affiliated with the men's magazine, that "S" (he asked that his name not be used) sought out Trek Passions. The final straw came when he was rejected by a woman with whom he had nothing in common. "She was the complete and total opposite of me in every way," he confesses. When the self-proclaimed "Spock-like personality" turned out not to be "fashionably ironic," she was disappointed. (He doesn't think his day job as a janitor helped his cause any.)
"S" says that he's been told: "Weird people should date other weird people - the normals don't quite understand."
Here's a typical intro from
the site, by a 31 year old male seeking female:
Your basic Spock-like personality here, seeking a woman with a personality somewhere in the Deanna Troi to Subcommander T'Pol range. will consider B'Elana Torres to Kira Nerys types depending on extenuating circumstances. No tribbles, please.
Here's another one from an average carbon-based life-form:
I've been in way too many relationships where the girl I'm with thinks "He's great, except for that Sci-Fi fascination" . . . I'm so done with that, and just looking for someone who can enjoy an hour of Trek with me instead of in the other room.
Lol, good luck with that, dude.
This one's short and to the point:
Take me to your bedroom, earthling. I live ST:OS, ST:TNG, BSG and BDSM.
Bwahaha! I'm not sure I'm familiar with the acronym for that last tv show, though.
Now, I know some of my readers have probably already opened up another window and are feverishly typing their intros as we speak. On the other hand, some of you geeks might be skeptical, like Conan O'Brien was:
Trek Passions received a boost back in March, when, on his late-night talk show, Conan O'Brien quipped: "The fans say the dating website is going great and any month now they hope a girl will join."
Funny, but I did check and yes, there are a few girls on the site. Here's a choice one:
My pictureÂ’s a stretched horizontally; IÂ’m not nearly that wide in real life, jeez. Just bought STNG 1 and 3 collectorÂ’s on DVD. . . . I like characters and episodes more than series, although STNG and Voyager have the best decorating, I mean, where would you rather be quartered; on PicardÂ’s Enterprise or KirkÂ’s? . . . To sum up my personality lets just say that if there were Hobbits in the Trek series I would identify strongly and have the same values. I also probably look and act like one, except IÂ’m bigger.
Now, I also know curious blog readers are thinking, "hey, Annika's got
TNG Season's one to three on DVD, and she's been known to sprinkle lines from
The Prisoner into her blog posts."
Well, stop wondering. Even if I didn't have a boyfriend already, you wouldn't catch me posting my Janeway inspired picture on the internet, trolling for über-nerds in some cyberspace version of the Mos Eisley Cantina.
I would simply wait until the next Creation convention, hang out by the comic tables, and bat my eyelashes like one of Mudd's Women.
Posted by: annika at
10:56 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 554 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Interestingly, theres as actual online Mos Eisley Cantina.
This is actually kind of cool. I bet they have a lot of those Klingon weddings, like on the Simpsons!
Posted by: E.M. at July 02, 2006 01:13 PM (qx/RL)
2
Try as I might, can't find any scantily clad pics of Uhura.
Posted by: Scof at July 02, 2006 04:13 PM (COaYC)
3
I think it is a great idea - If I was more star trek inspired and I was single, I'd consider looking there.
As it is, I met my spouse on-line on one of the very old Prodigy bb's - rush limbaugh's, actually.
Posted by: Beth Donovan at July 02, 2006 05:08 PM (9FPYz)
4
Gimme a fuckin break, like they didn't invent 25th century pocket pussys and sex androids that are better than the real thing! Why would these guys NEED women?
Posted by: Casca at July 02, 2006 07:20 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at July 02, 2006 09:10 PM (8qdYC)
Posted by: Casca at July 02, 2006 10:07 PM (2gORp)
7
My wife and I went to a Sci-Fi convention recently and the big costume contest is always a hoot. This one featured three Princess Leah's in the dancing girl costume and they ranged from about 180-240 lbs.
They should have had a special category for "most likely to be mistaken for a dirigible."
Posted by: kyle8 at July 03, 2006 03:28 AM (1jWFc)
8
Kyle8,
I know!! Jesus H, man! Everytime I see one of those, I wanna yell out "Hey! It wasn't
Jabba wearin' the suit, ya freak!"
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 03, 2006 08:10 AM (xHyDY)
9
It's the very same reason that I avoid Whalemart like the plague. C'mon people, do you really need a fucking McDonald's in there? Hell even if they got rid of the morbidly obese, I'd still be off put by the hordes chattering like monkeys in their savage tongues. Durkha, Durkha, Mohammad, Allah.
Posted by: Casca at July 03, 2006 11:40 AM (rEC2k)
10
Man, I've said it dozens of times: Wal-Mart's like a cross between Dawn of the Dead and a cattle drive: Super-sized humans in a zombie-like trance. Totally... that's why I avoid Wal-Mart.
Cas: The Wal-Marts around me have Subways installed. I wonder if they're not subliminally saying
"Our customers need to make like Jerrod".
Back on topic: I'm pretty geek, man, but even
I recoil at the thought of trolling for dates through a Star Trek-centric service. Although catch me on certain days, and my resistence might be lower...
And what's with that line outta the CSMonitor story?:
"Weird people should date other weird people - the normals don't quite understand."
Ok. Once, and one time only for those supposed anti-stereotyping stereotypers in the MSM: Science Fiction fans
Are. Not. Abnormal.. We fans
Are. Not. Weird (well, maybe the ones who dress up are, but
man, those guys are really out there...). We have our own obsessions, true, but how's a guy who's memorized lines out of ST:TOS any different from a guy who can recite box scores for any given World Series from memory?
No, I can't do either... but lines from X-Files, I might have a shot

Another rant at the story: Who the HELL writes
"May the Force Be With Them" in a story about
Star Trek??!! Hel-
lo!!
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 03, 2006 01:38 PM (xHyDY)
11
Casca you sound like John Rocker...
Posted by: Scof at July 03, 2006 06:00 PM (COaYC)
12
"it`s not exactly "scifi". It`s simply on the SciFi channel."
hmmm, there's a new rubric i've seen occasionally: "speculative fiction."
Posted by: annika at July 03, 2006 06:38 PM (fxTDF)
13
BTW, can't wait till the new Battlestar Galactica's return. Even if that show were not SCI_FI it is absolutely the most kick ass writing on TV since perhaps the old Playhouse 90 in the early 1960's.
Posted by: kyle8 at July 04, 2006 07:03 AM (SLmNP)
Posted by: Dave J at July 04, 2006 07:07 AM (S6J6x)
15
"Casca you sound like John Rocker..."
Why, because I often feel like a stranger in my native land? Because I swim in a sea of the culturally ignorant?
Posted by: Casca at July 04, 2006 09:17 AM (2gORp)
16
Beth:
Ok. You got me there.
Anni:
I've seen that term tossed about too. Don't see any advantage to sticking a new moniker across several well-established and accepted categories, but then again, the language isn't alive unless it morphs and evolves, right?
Dave J:
Best Triumph skit
ever! Best Star Wars skit too!
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at July 04, 2006 12:45 PM (xHyDY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 29, 2006
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
I think we all understand that the mainstream media cannot be trusted to analyze Supreme Court decisions within even a basic level of competence.
Accordingly, I've printed out all 101 pages of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, and now that I am home from work, I will attempt to read through it. I may not finish, but even if I only get the highlights, I am confident that I will understand it more thoroughly than the smartest person on staff at USA Today or the L.A. Times could ever hope to.
But for now, I have some Gitmo related questions.
I hear that the ruling does not mean that the U.S. must release the Guantanamo Bay prisoners. (Democrats and foreign types who want us to close the prison are probably disappointed about that.) So, if that means that holding these whatever you want to call them people at Gitmo is okay, then is it only that trying them by military tribunal is not okay?
If so, is the only reason we're insisting on trying them in the first place because that's the only way we can kill them? Otherwise we'd just hold onto them until the end of the war, like we've always done with people we capture on a battlefield.
And if just holding onto them until the end of the war is something that every country has always done in every war, why do some people want us to close down Gitmo? Are people like Carter and Koffi Anon arguing that we don't have the right to hold people we capture on a battlefield?
What do the Gitmo critics want us to do with these prisoners, release them like they were illegal aliens? If so, won't they end up back here again, just like illegal aliens?
Now, if the only reason we are trying these detainees is so we can get the death penalty on them, then we shouldn't be risking the chance that they might be acquitted. I'd rather they just languish in jail until the war is over. And I'm not talking about the Iraq war. As we all know, the "War On Terror" will be going on for a long long time.
If these guys are now "prisoners of war," so be it. I haven't heard of any requirement in international law that a country must unilaterally release prisoners of war before a war is finished. Effectively, these guys probably already have a life sentence. So why bother with a military tribunal at all?
Update: Okay, page three of the decision says, "Hamdan apparently is not subject to the death penalty (at least as matters now stand) and may receive a prison sentence shorter than 10 years . . ."
So again, why do we even need to put him on trial? Can't we just hold onto him indefinitely?
Update 2: This opinion is kicking my ass. I'm at page 27. Someone put some coffee on.
Update 3: Fuck if I'm going to sit here reading this crap on my vacation when I'm a) not getting paid for it, and b) not getting graded for it.
The pool is calling. I'm out.
Oh, here's the USA Today article I cracked on earlier. Not so cocky now, I guess.
Update 4: Check this out:
Hamdan my walkinÂ’ cane
Hamdan my walkinÂ’ cane
Hamdan my walkinÂ’ cane
IÂ’m a gonna catch that midnight train
All my sins they've taken away, taken away
If I die in Gitmo jail
If I die in Gitmo jail
If I die in Gitmo jail
Send my body back C.O.D.
All my sins they've taken away, taken away
Hamdan my book of Koran
Hamdan my book of Koran
Hamdan my book of Koran
IÂ’m gonna get drunk sure as youÂ’re born
All my sins they've taken away, taken away
It just came to me. Make of it what you will. Here's
The Knitters' version.
That's why I'm the cool connector... makin' connections between things that maybe... don't need connectin'.
Posted by: annika at
06:06 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 669 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Ahhhhhh, that's why I love you!
Posted by: Casca at June 29, 2006 06:30 PM (2gORp)
2
Brace yourself. Wading through that decision is an endurance test. The majority decision was to grant habeas to Hamdan and state that Bush's tribunals have no basis in law. There's a plurality decision in there that I'm still trying to decipher.
Scalia's dissent is a thing of directness and joy, ripping the majority for claiming jurisdiction in the face of a statute that revokes jurisdiction from the Court.
Thomas then writes the dissent's assault on the "merits" of Hamdan's case, but I haven't delved into that yet.
The Court pointedly does not say Bush cannot continue to hold detainees at Gitmo as enemy combatants. They emphasize that issue wasn't in the appeal and acknowledge that the detainees are probably an on-going threat to the US (at the least). So Carter and Kofi can go wander off and smoke a crack pipe together. (Which, come to think of it, is the only way to explain some of their "reasoning.")
For the most part I don't have an issue with how the Court ruled except in one regard, the bit about asserting the right to adjudicate the issue even though Congress explicitly removed it from their jurisdiction. According to some estimates, this opens the floodgate to some 600 habeas filings dealing with detainees. Egads! Can you say "clogged calendar"?
Once I finish with the "merits" of the case I'll probably hate it more.
Posted by: bob at June 29, 2006 06:50 PM (R0/A7)
3
What I had heard from the MSM was that the tribunals were not run correctedly, if they can be run at all.
If you had a chance to finish, what is your final analysis of the opinions, and did you read both?
Posted by: will at June 30, 2006 03:56 AM (GzvlQ)
4
Bob,
The point you bring up is a good one: The Court did ignore Congress. But, they also ignored precedent regarding the President's authority to set up military tribunals. Worse yet was the ludicrous idea the somehow the Geneva Conventions apply to terroists that fight for no country and wear no uniforms. This is another example of the Court deciding that they get to make law rather than interpret it. Enough of this liberal nonsense about the excessive power of the Executive. The Executive and his party must face the voters on regular intervals and are subject to the democratic process. The Supreme Court and the courts generally act as if they are royalty and are accountable to nobody.
Posted by: blu at June 30, 2006 10:57 AM (b1ukN)
5
Aren't some folks making too big a deal about this? Other sites I'm reading seems to imply that what the President was doing would be permissible if Congress authorized it. News sources like the NYTimes are making this out to be some shuddering defeat (the NYT says "...such a sweeping and categorical defeat for the administration..."), but that to me sounds like severe overreach, wishful thinking, even. The authority
to detain those folks wasn't even addressed, and the authority to
try the folks was said to be one issued by Congress, not assumed by the President. To me, that seems to be a rather narrowly focused point. Maybe Anni can answer when she's got the time, but my question stands: Why is this being taken as such a blow to the Administration? It's almost as if the courts were saying "Close. Try again, this time with Congress".
Am I wrong about that? Again, I have .00000001% legal expertise, so I haven't even tried to wade through the text of the decisions themselves, only what other sites are saying about it (like
here).
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at June 30, 2006 11:23 AM (xHyDY)
6
Blu, I'm still wading through the bits about the Geneva Conventions, but there application here -- as you say -- is worse than silly. The Court "reasoning" is in essence since al Qaeda does not represent a nation then a conflict with al Qaeda cannot be "international", in a conflict between nations, therefore they apply a portion of the Conventions that applies only to internal conflicts (i.e., civil wars within a single country). Awk, my head explodes.
Annika,
This Court in this ruling affirms the President's authority to declare someone an enemy combatant (subject to challenge), affirms that he may detain enemy combatants, and affirms that those so detained may be held "for the duration of hostilities." So I'm with you, why the push to put the guy on trial?
Unless you look at as part of a process for closing the detention facilities. That is, you put on trial, convict, and incarcerate the worst of the worst, then release the rest to their countries of origin. Thus, the Gitmo detention facility is emptied and may be closed. This ruling puts the skids on that idea and thus mandates that they remain open.
ElMondo, yes, Bush can go to Congress and get either clarification on his tribunal authority or get it established and thus effectively reverse this decision.
Last, this decision is oh so not a major blow against Bush. It affirms that he can detain enemy combatants (like Hamdan) until such time as the conflict is resolved, which may be for a very long time. That's a slap at positions taken by the NYT and others on the left. It's a major slap at Congress for having the audacity to attempt to remove a matter from the jurisdiction of the Court. Bush gets a minor reprimand for attempting to form tribunals, and that part is mostly a plurality decision and thus persuasive but not binding.
The reporting on this just plain sucks, almost as badly as the ruling itself.
Posted by: bob at June 30, 2006 04:39 PM (R0/A7)
7
This a big boon for the Republicans. The Supreme Court's mistake can easily be fixed by legislation. Every one who votes against the fix will be seen as supporting terrorists.
Posted by: Jake at June 30, 2006 04:47 PM (r/5D/)
8
You are correct grasshopper.
Posted by: Casca at June 30, 2006 10:07 PM (2gORp)
9
Hank Aaron, and Duke Ellington? I understand MLK, but hell, give me GW Carver, or any number of lessor known black men who've made real accomplishments. In any case, few of any race compare to Washington and Lincoln.
Posted by: Casca at July 01, 2006 11:31 PM (2gORp)
10
Casca makes some good points, in a way.
Personally, I'm appalled you've got FDR up there, and not Teddy. TR's greatest accomplishment, among his many,
many was to prove to the world the US was a world power and not some little upstart country made up of castoffs and runaways.
Also, he let his kids keep rats as pets in the White House.
Posted by: Victor at July 02, 2006 03:57 AM (l+W8Z)
11
I have a very long discussion of this on my blog.
The issue of detention is distinct from punishment. Hamdi made explicit that detention is allowed so long as status review panels are used, and those panels were creatd and employed soon after Hamdi's bullshit habeas petition succeeded. (He has since been released to the Saudis). The goal of the tribunals is to punish these guys for war crimes, including the crime of being members of al Qaeda. If you will, like the difference between civil and criminal trials, we can detain for duration of hostilities with low theshold determinations by status review panels but higher stakes permanent punishments as war criminals (including punishments such as death) must be meted out with higher standards. According to Hamdan those must be basically as high as UCMJ court martials which is ridiculous for a number of reasons, not least that article 36 of the UCMJ contemplates lesser standards in the commissions, the DTA authorizes commissions, and the international law standard mandated by Geneva surely cannot require higher degrees of procedural protections than other Geneva signatories. In other words, some low uniform international standard must apply to Geneva Article III, whether it applies in this case or not.
Anyway, my essay is long and probably a little detailed, but not nearly so long and tedious as the majority and plurality opinions in Hamdan itself. God help those prolix justices.
Posted by: Roach at July 03, 2006 11:58 PM (bqbkz)
12
What's all the fuss about? Let's just do what the Supremes and the Democrats want and release each of the prisoners.
Back to the authorities in their country of origin, of course.
Posted by: shelly at July 04, 2006 08:14 AM (BJYNn)
13
I used to have to wear my brother's hamdans. Boy, those were tough years...
Posted by: Kevin at July 04, 2006 09:40 PM (++0ve)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Happy Birthday Ian Paice!
Come celebrate Ian Paice's birthday with me over at
Six Meat Buffet!
Posted by: annika at
06:57 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just finally saw the "Vote Insufferable Pricks in '06" thing from six meat buffet, excellent stuff! I will be voting for the pricks this year!
Posted by: Scof at June 29, 2006 02:21 PM (a3fqn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 28, 2006
Wednesday Is Poetry Day: Vogon Poetry II
You know when I post a poem at night, it means I've either been really busy, the blog's been acting up, or I just couldn't find any inspired choices. Today was a perfect storm of all three reasons.
Since the most important news item of the day was the Star Jones bullshit - more important than Korean missiles or Iranian bombs or terrorist sleeper cells or treasonous papers and politicians or Iraqi amnesty or Israel kicking ass.
Star Jones, Star Jones, Star Jones!
Star Jones, Star Jones, that's what's important. But how does one best glean clues about Star Jones's mysterious exit friom the View? One need look no further than the newest Viewchik. And how better to stay informed about Star Jones lore than by reading some more bad Vogon poetry from the poet laureate of the Vogons herself, Rosie O'Donnell.
Star View
there is drama at the view
regis went on yesterday
and said
hey there is an elephant in the living room
no one likes to pretend
as if it were real
there comes a point
where u become complicit
star jones had weight loss surgery
she had part of her stomach bypassed
that is how she lost 1/2 herself
she refuses to say this
which is her right
but we do not have to pretend
we do not know
any fatty will tell u
it is nearly impossible to go
from where she was
to where she is
without medical intervention
dats da fact jack
and it is ok
talk to ur doctor
decide for yourself
if this is the option for u
by all means do it
it is hard to be fat
u get tired
ur knees hurt
people stare at u
think u less then
u feel less then
when i see one of r own
fly away from planet plus
i wave with misty eyes
proud astonished worried
we have a high recidivism rate
we us r tribe
sis and bros
so star shrinks b4 our eyes
we know the truth
but nod as she talks about
pilates and will power
i am sure star jones
beneathe the beyonce bravado
is a scared lil girl
who grew her body big
strong and safe
there is no delete button
in real life
george bush
talking about the success
in iraq
with star like showmanship
he thinking we still believe
what we know is not true
we dont buy it
peace to star jones
every wave hits the shore
Rosie wisdom, can't live with it, can't live without it.
Posted by: annika at
09:44 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 439 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I can't wait until she chokes on a ham sandwich. Like her superego is going to fit with that grotesque manage of bitchy twats.
Posted by: Casca at June 29, 2006 06:14 AM (rEC2k)
2
I think my brain tried to crawl out of my ear halfway through the poem.
Posted by: Jess at June 29, 2006 07:57 AM (m4pDe)
3
Holy crap. I really had to CONCENTRATE to get through that.
Posted by: red at June 29, 2006 09:35 AM (rNgdr)
4
I'm beginning to wonder if I made a mistake by directing you to that site.
Posted by: Victor at June 29, 2006 10:55 AM (L3qPK)
5
Annika:
You're wrong, I CAN live without Rosie wisdom.
Posted by: JJJET at June 29, 2006 03:42 PM (LNyv5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Coolest Thing On The Internets Of The Day
This game is awesome. You play a bouncer, and your job is to pummel Kevin Federline into a bloody stump. Not surprisingly, it is a lot of fun. Don't forget to mix in a lot of body shots too.
h/t to Jim via Beth.
Posted by: annika at
09:00 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
June 27, 2006
Customer Satisfaction Survey Results
For those who are interested, here are the results of last week's
blog customer satisfaction survey.
Anyone who knows anything about statistics, feel free to provide your analysis.
more...
Posted by: annika at
05:54 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
1
mu.nu sucks. Even after I answered your poll I had further lost posts.
Your blog is the only one for which I save my post, just in case it is lost and I have to re-post later. What a nuisance.
Posted by: shelly at June 28, 2006 03:38 AM (BJYNn)
2
LMAO, like taking candy from a baby... cause like what you have to say is so... important?
Heh, if you're going to hang it over the plate like that, I'm going to have to swing at it.
Posted by: Casca at June 28, 2006 06:33 AM (rEC2k)
3
I will admit, Annie, this commenting system is not my favorite. It never remembers me, and it does sometimes lose what I have to say.
Posted by: Hugo Schwyzer at June 28, 2006 07:24 AM (yLeev)
4
It never loses my stuff. It just flips me a big digital bird when I try to open a comment box. DENIED! Only happens occasionally, but it's still very frustrating.
Posted by: Matt at June 28, 2006 07:59 AM (10G2T)
5
Hell, if you could have hit a curve, you'd still be in Columbus...
Posted by: shelly at June 28, 2006 07:27 PM (BJYNn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 26, 2006
Bowtie Pasta Parmesan With Prosciutto And Sun-Dried Tomatoes
My culinary skills produce more misses than hits, but occasionally I make something that is worth passing on. Please do not ask me about the sole meunière of a few weeks back. $35 dollars worth of fish and half of it wasted. But cooking fish requires delicacy, and I don't do anything delicately. (Well, not unless you ask nicely.)
Rather, I prefer to cook dishes that can be mixed up with a sauce, and served with a big spoon. Like the following one, which is based on a recipe from Le Cordon Bleu Complete Cook: Home Collection.
-¼ cup olive oil
-one 12 oz. package of bowtie pasta (aka farfalle)
-one large yellow onion, sliced or chopped, whichever you prefer
-about two thirds of a package of regular mushrooms, pre-sliced (what is that, two cups?)
-half a cup or more of julienned sun-dried tomatoes
-two cloves of garlic, minced
-4 oz. of prosciutto slices
-1¼ cup of Silk or some other plain soy milk
-one cup grated parmesan, or as I like to call it "Farmer John" cheese
-one to two teaspoons of capers
Start boiling the water for the pasta. You all know how to make pasta. I would subtract a minute or so from the cooking time to keep it just
al dente, because the pasta will continue to cook after you drain the water and mix it with the sauce. You don't want the pasta to get too soft.
While the pasta water is heating, prepare the sauce. In a large pan, heat the olive oil until a tiny chunk of onion fries immediately when you throw it in. Turn down to medium heat. Then throw the sun-dried tomatoes, mushrooms, garlic, and the sliced or chopped onion in there. I like chopped onion because sliced onions remind me too much of earthworms after they're cooked.
Fry that stuff until the onions get browned. Be careful with the sun-dried tomatoes, which burn easily. Adjust the heat accordingly. This should take about 2 minutes. Then add the soy milk and the capers. Bring the sauce to a simmer, about another two or three minutes. Then fold in the parmesan cheese. Turn off the heat and cover the pan while you finish with the pasta.
When the pasta is ready, drain it. Then chop the prosciutto slices roughly crosswise into one inch wide pieces. Throw them in the sauce, then pour the sauce immediately over the pasta. Mix the whole thing and transfer to a serving bowl.
There you have it. Simple and fast. The prosciutto goes in last so it will retain some of its color, but eventually the red cooks away. Especially after microwaving the next day, but it still tastes good. Soy milk is a pretty good substitute for the heavy cream called for in the original recipe. I suggest a fresh sourdough baguette and a glass of merlot to go with this meal.
Posted by: annika at
01:51 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 501 words, total size 3 kb.
1
"I like chopped onion because sliced onions remind me too much of earthworms after they're cooked."
Huh - you've cooked earthworms?
Posted by: OS at June 26, 2006 08:23 PM (KEZPK)
2
Did you top that off with pudding pops?
Posted by: Casca at June 26, 2006 10:11 PM (2gORp)
3
Next time you try sole meunière try adding a little vegetable oil to the butter. Butter has a pretty low burning point and a little vegetable oil helps raise hat point.
Why'd you sub soy milk for the cream? It seems the sauce wouldn't be as thick and creamy w/o the fat.
Posted by: Victor at June 27, 2006 02:22 AM (l+W8Z)
4
I make lots of pasta dishes. But I would never add a whole onion to one, Onion is such a powerful flavor it can drown out all the others.
I like making red sauces with a little sour cream in them, as well as either mozzerella or parmisian. and just for variety I might add gruyere.
For a lite dish try using ground turkey, or turkey sausages.
Posted by: kyle8 at June 27, 2006 03:17 AM (FGbd8)
5
The vegetable oil w/ butter idea is one i'd heard of but i totally forgot about it that time. Dang.
I substituted soy milk because it's healthier and i always have some on hand. It works fine.
I think a yellow onion is mild enough for this sauce.
I always substitute ground turkey for my red pasta sauces. I've made a gorgonzola sauce dish with arugula, which i got out of a newspaper. that was really nice. I should try gruyere someday, that sounds good.
Posted by: annika at June 27, 2006 06:22 AM (fxTDF)
6
Now is the time when I go off with my, "Fat is a necessary nutrient in moderation, or when you want something to taste good," rant...but since I'm a guest here I won't.
Posted by: Victor at June 27, 2006 10:03 AM (L3qPK)
7
Third year already? Bored to death?
Go to law school; learn to cook.
Posted by: shelly at June 27, 2006 12:45 PM (BJYNn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 25, 2006
Coolest Thing On The Internets Of The Day
The
Kung Fu Fuck You technique. I've been practicing that one for years, but I'm not as good as those guys.
Honorable mention: check out this utility for sick Foley artists. I totally lost it on "Bowels of the Titanic."
Both via Harvey!
Posted by: annika at
08:05 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My God. My talents are nothing compared to these professionals.
Posted by: Mark at June 25, 2006 08:12 PM (CwodB)
2
Heh, regarding this "Customer Satisfaction" stuff: "I can't get no, sat, iss, fac, shun. But I try, and I try, and I try, and I try."
Posted by: Casca at June 26, 2006 06:29 AM (rEC2k)
3
I'm almost afraid to ask you to define, "totally lost it."
:~|
:~|
:~|
:~)
OK, I'm not. annika, what do you mean by, "totally lost it?" Because I got a funny feeling we're not thinking the same thing.
Posted by: Victor at June 26, 2006 01:04 PM (L3qPK)
4
lol, "lost it," meaning "cracked up!" not control of the bowels.
Posted by: annika at June 26, 2006 01:10 PM (fxTDF)
Posted by: Victor at June 27, 2006 10:09 AM (L3qPK)
6
The F-U technique reminded me of taking Kung-Fun in Junior High School because of the bullies. ;-)
Posted by: DirtCrashr at June 27, 2006 10:23 AM (pmP8H)
7
Not as good as Ninja Bachelor Party, but pretty funny.
Posted by: Jim Treacher at June 27, 2006 04:21 PM (fPhp8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 24, 2006
Peter Pumpkin The Spectacular Pumpkin, Episode 43
What's that you say? She's now resorted to link-whoring
88Slide?
Oh the humanity!
Posted by: annika at
01:40 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
Hippies In Colorado
I don't know why, but
this story makes me laugh. Some choice excerpts:
"I had a shotgun or AK (semi-automatic weapon) pointed at my chest. (The officers) kept saying, 'We're going to shoot your (expletive) dog.' They made this woman cry - she was shaking," said Lobo, a Rainbow Family member.
LOL!
"They tried to trample us with their horses, and all we did was have our arms up in peace," he said. "I even pulled my pants down - which was probably indecent exposure - to show them I didn't have anything on me."
ROTFL!
"I've been here since Saturday, and I've already received three (citations). Look, I'm sick of being harassed. Just because I'm in the middle of the woods with a group of people doesn't mean I don't have a job, that I don't have a family and that I don't contribute to society,"
Bwahahaha!
"All they had to do was get a bullhorn and say 'We've got guns.' They shouldn't have pulled out their guns, that's not kosher, man,"
We are stardust, we are golden... we are picking a
different county next year!
h/t DPGI v.2
Posted by: annika at
12:28 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 188 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Damn, I was in Durango, Co. last week, and one of the local cowboys there said an infestation of hippies had also appeared somewhere in the area, perhaps Telluride. We headed up that way, but never found the hippies, however, we did find a bunch of stupid liberals mucking up the place.
The scenery was great, but putting up with liberal assholes from California strained my last nerve, and a confrontation resulted in some hurt feelings, if not a bloody nose.
Posted by: jesusland joe at June 24, 2006 03:04 PM (rUyw4)
2
Sounds like a cult -- call Janet "torch" Reno, she'll know how to handle these losers ;->
Posted by: Purple Avenger at June 25, 2006 05:10 AM (M0Kdm)
3
Yeah, this isn't really very funny. Authoritarian tactics on the part of the federal government, violations of the constitutional right to assemble... sounds like a laugh riot. Just wait until they're telling
you that you can't be where you want to be, for no reason, and that you must comply or be screwed by the legal runaround.
Posted by: Embryo at June 25, 2006 07:22 AM (sUWK+)
4
you're right of course, embryo. i'm still laughing though!
Posted by: annika at June 25, 2006 07:50 AM (fxTDF)
5
Be careful for what you wish for.
The Forest Service has dictatorial police powers in their protection of their land. The trees and the forest floor trumps all human rights. It was hippies that pressured the government to put these totalitarian rules into force in the first place.
Will these hippies now turn Republican?
Posted by: Jake at June 25, 2006 09:03 AM (r/5D/)
6
Jake is right. The hippies are reaping what they have sown. What say you about that, Embryo?
Posted by: jesusland joe at June 25, 2006 03:27 PM (rUyw4)
7
Jeebus, Embryo,
Are you saying the law in our National Forests should be ignored?
I think it should be pointed out how past experiences with the Rainbow Family have turned the locals against them. It's not like the Rainbows have be the best guests...
"The group, which bills itself as an alternative society for those who wish to leave the mainstream, has failed to sign a special-use permit required by the Forest Service for groups of 75 or more. As a result, rangers Monday barred people from the site and issued between 60 and 70 citations to some of the early arrivals.
Many residents and business people are worried that the trouble is just beginning.
"'When it's over, all that's left is going to be one square mile of feces,' said Alicia Spanhake of Steamboat Springs. 'I hate hippies.'"
source - http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_3960887
Posted by: jcrue at June 25, 2006 03:54 PM (Xk75c)
8
My God, it is perfection. Hoist upon their own petards, these tree huggers now find out that the law applies equally to all. The very laws they forced into creation.
Doesn't the Forest Service know that they are "Liberals", therefore God sanctioned and created, and further exempt from these laws, due to their exalted status?
I guess not.
Posted by: shelly at June 26, 2006 02:29 AM (BJYNn)
9
Everyone's missing the true source of hilarity, courtesy Lobo:
I had a shotgun or AK (semi-automatic weapon) pointed at my chest...
Assault rifle, shotgun, cap gun...they're all the same to hippies. Betcha if one of us showed up at that camp w/ a Super Soaker they'd all piss themselves.
Posted by: Victor at June 26, 2006 08:07 AM (L3qPK)
10
Ha ha, good catch, Victor! This is one of those stories that just keeps on giving(laughs, that is). Thanks, Annika!
Posted by: jesusland joe at June 26, 2006 09:37 AM (rUyw4)
11
I swear I saw this on an episode of King of the Hill last week.
Hank Hill's solution was to make the "guests" of the park uncomfortable enough to leave. He convinced the park service to shut down the porta-potties and provitions stores (temporarily out of service). Once the hippies ran out of food, they just left.
Simplistic, I know. But it was still funny has heck. I love that show.
Posted by: Trint at June 26, 2006 10:27 AM (SlSdA)
12
I live in Colorado and let me tell you, there's a lot of old stale 60's holdout ex-hippies running around. They definitely detract from the scenery.
And FORGET Telluride. To quote Yogi Berra, "Nobody goes there anymore- it's too crowded". I went once and was turned off by all the poseurs and street people and hippie scumbags and punks on skateboards.
These Rainbow people need to be hosed down, deloused, loaded on buses, and sent to effin' New Jersey.
Posted by: Barry at June 28, 2006 09:35 AM (kKjaJ)
13
One edited story,with quotes taken out of context, and suddenly you're all experts?
Do some more reserch.
Posted by: t.d.steve at June 30, 2006 02:08 PM (pm8qO)
14
Free to look like what you want or think what you want.
The "Government" does favor businesses over individuals everyday-the bigger the business the bigger the favors.
When the government=state favors business=corporations too much a state of fascism exists.
Do these people up there really hurt any business in colorado? Why does it seem that so many people hate so called hippies?
Posted by: libertyman at July 04, 2006 09:41 AM (dTaNx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Aaron Spelling
This man was a huge part of my formative years. Aaron Spelling, the man who taught everyone the zip code for Beverly Hills
has passed away.

Spelling, a onetime movie bit player who created a massive number of hit series, from the vintage "Charlie's Angels" and "Dynasty" to "Beverly Hills 90210" and "Melrose Place," died Friday, his publicist said. He was 83.
Spelling died at his home in Los Angeles after suffering a stroke on June 18, according to publicist Kevin Sasaki.
Spelling's other hit series included "Love Boat," "Fantasy Island," "Burke's Law," "The Mod Squad," "Starsky and Hutch," "T.J. Hooker," "Matt Houston," "Hart to Hart" and "Hotel." He kept his hand in 21st-century TV with series including "7th Heaven" and "Summerland."
. . .
During the 1970s and 1980s, Spelling provided series and movies exclusively for ABC and is credited for the network's rise to major status. Jokesters referred to it as "The Aaron Broadcasting Company."
Success was not without its thorns. TV critics denounced Spelling for fostering fluff and nighttime soap operas. He called his shows "mind candy"; critics referred to them as "mindless candy."
"The knocks by the critics bother you," he admitted in a 1986 interview with The Associated Press.
"But you have a choice of proving yourself to 300 critics or 30 million fans. You have to make a choice. I think you're also categorized by the critics. If you do something good they almost don't want to like it."
. . .
Spelling had arrived in Hollywood virtually penniless in the early 1950s. By the 1980s, Forbes magazine estimated his wealth at $300 million. He enjoyed his status, working in a Hollywood office larger than those of golden-era moguls ("I'm slightly claustrophpobic," he explained.) He gifted his second wife, Candy, with a 40-carat diamond ring.
. . .
Spelling grew up in a small frame house on Browder Street in Dallas "on the wrong side of the tracks," he wrote in his 1996 autobiography. He was the fourth son of immigrant Jews, his father from Poland, mother from Russia. The father's name, Spurling, was simplified to Spelling by an Ellis Island official.
Spelling enlisted in the Army Air Corps after graduating from high school in 1942.
"I grew up thinking 'Jew boy' was one word," the producer wrote in his memoir, "Aaron Spelling: A Prime-Time Life." He was considered strange by his Dallas schoolmates because his parents spoke Yiddish. He was subjected to anti-Semitic taunts and beatings on his way home from school.
At 8, the boy suffered what he termed a nervous breakdown, and he spent a year in bed. He later considered that period the birth of his creative urge. He fell in love with great storytellers, especially O. Henry. Of his early TV series he said, "They are all O. Henry short stories."
Rest in peace, and thank you friend.
Posted by: annika at
11:33 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 482 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I always liked this guy. Unlike some Hollywooders, he seemed very down to earth despite his tremendous success. My condolences to his friends and family. (And Heather Locklear)
Posted by: Mike C. at June 25, 2006 05:17 PM (y6n8O)
2
Alas, he leaves behind him the dubious legacy of Tori.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at June 26, 2006 01:36 AM (TDwc6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
111kb generated in CPU 0.0582, elapsed 0.1429 seconds.
80 queries taking 0.1117 seconds, 335 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.